Doujinshi Incesto Español Online

Why is the resistance of the matter?

Hi!

text I write, the Audit Committee, held (26/08/2009) driven by a great despair, to motivate the Mayor to execute all KK City Council resolutions.

What is it?

on 30.06.2009 r City Council adopted resolutions, as a result of consideration of citizens' complaints to the President by the Audit Committee - I am the president:

a) No XLII/509/09 agree to a settlement between the President and the complainant for payment of side compensation for its lost property through the fault of the municipality;

b) No XLII/510/09 undertake to restore to the applicant on the list of persons entitled to a dwelling in the first place, which before receiving housing has been unduly removed;

c) No XLII/511/09 requiring the reclassification of a dwelling in which the applicant resides, and intended to hire for an indefinite period in the social housing due to the fact that the premises in question is a standard social housing, and Ms. Alexander has the right for social housing and the conclusion of the agreement with her.

president does not follow these resolutions of the City Council explaining that the parties can enforce their rights before the Court and, if a person unlawfully removed from the waiting lists for residential premises is pending reintroducing it in the list, but keeping the new deadline for submission proposal, which is equal to the remote site, even if they will be given priority. The provision of Article

. 30, paragraph 1 of the Act of 8 March 1990 ro Local Government says: "The mayor carries out the resolution of the municipal council and municipal tasks defined by the law." When the Commission that I felt I my opinion the President has committed a breach of statutory provisions, inferring that the resolutions in question did not repeal the Opole Voivod, the Mayor must perform each of the City Council resolution, which supports the Commission of the City legal counsel has stated that the President did not commit a crime failing to implement all the resolutions of the City Council (!?). During the discussions the Commission has not reached a view to the problem caused by me, but sent to the Commission on Legal - Administrative, as a closer in substance, in order to try to propose a City Council action that will motivate the Mayor to execute all the laws are not contrary to the resolutions of the City Council . I am also a member of the Legal Affairs Committee, weapons in this case was not filed, only the legal struggles I move to another collective body (that is only apparently has no effect on the course of urban issues, has a very large and hence the call to the topic: the role of legislative body and executive).

It seems that only a reduction in pay will motivate the President to perform all the law is not contrary to the City Council resolutions and conclusions of the councilors, who are close to ordinary people, because if that does not work, how well that there is a public function exercised kadencyjność (election Fall 2010 r getting closer).

Regards.

Richard Masalski - City Council Cllr Kedzierzyn - Kozle

How Long Can Herpes Survivr In The Environment

rent.

Hi!

recently in Kedzierzyn-Kozle media use competitive as it is expected to increase rents by more than 200%. Based on reported the media data shows that the rent increase from the current 3.5 how to write zł per square meter to a maximum of 6, 13 zł per sq m or about 2, 63 zł, and this is how he does not expect a 75 increase in rent, 14%, and not from the space taken 200%. Someone is wrong in counting, it seems that my counting is correct.

recall that the last rent increase took place in 2006 and failed in 2007, was repealed by the Governor of Opole due to my vigilance, because the Mayor had no legal basis for delegation of its introduction. Because nobody had thanked them for protection against rent increase, and now Mayor of the City is presented as the good (I want to reduce the amount of the increases), and the City Council as the bad (approved a program that forces the Mayor of raising rents jumping). - As far as actually to increase the rent? Maximum (for a statistical property of the area. 50 sqm) in 2009 for: 131.5 zł, then each year by 5%. So for a total of Statistical communal apartment rented for an indefinite period will pay rent of about 306 zł. at the current 166.5 zł (again, I'm 200% rent increase?) It must be remembered that the amount of rent is affected by the decision Opole Voivod fixing the replacement rate of 1 sq. m area. residential area. The higher it is, and the higher rent.

But rent in rented accommodation could be even lower than it is today. How? I suggested that, at the request of the tenant's leased premises for an indefinite period was by the Mayor in situations justifying it reclassified for social housing and the rent for such a station is only 50% of the rent as a Council Tenant and the premises would be in a statistical 153 zł. When the applicant's financial situation would improve by the same social housing would be transformed back into the communal, again referring with people living in the lease agreement for an indefinite period. Mayor and all City Council has already twice rejected my proposal. But third time lucky. Reunite her with the draft resolution on the matter.

The city is a lot of shouting that this is to happen will hurt poor people. Again. You have to just quickly sell the municipal housing stock of their tenants as a% of values, and against those who do not acquire them, and do not have the resources for the payment of rent at 6 zł for retraining sq m of premises used for social and municipal rent will then be 3 zł per sq. m., that is for the poor tenants of apartments currently rented for an indefinite term rent for the same premises with a temporary status of social housing, will be at the current rent.

In addition it should be added and that the City Council przyjmowała Multi-Housing Program The real Municipal Waste KK, which are records of the rental policy, he was associated with the resolution of the City Council concerning the sale of dwellings to be 3%. In the high rents, have led tenants to buy their rented flats. It happened so that the view prevailed that this law shall determine the Mayor increases, where the City Council only agrees or rejects the proposal and the current Mayor is in favor of selling homes for 10 - 15% of the value, which is really a lot of people (tenants) are prevented from acquiring housing and escape from high rents, because they can afford repair fund fees and fees for the management of common property (which together are comparable to the rent before the planned increases), but not the fees attributable to the owner and the repayment of housing loan (which many must borrow to purchase an apartment for 10 - 15% of the value of what you do not need to do in the event of acquisition of the same premises as 1% of value). Therefore, the view which I am the author of the transfer of communal dwellings for 1 - 3% is a legitimate social and economic factors.

Unfortunately, as often happens with us, with a plan for changes in housing policy, has remained an item: increase in rents when related to the privatization of residential property adjusted to the abundance of tenants (1 - 3% of the property) is implemented.

Richard Masalski - City Council Cllr Kedzierzyn - Kozle