Soul Silver Online Rom

The Finance community KK.

Hi!

Yes, the City Council adopt the municipal budget for the year, but the draft budget for the Mayor draw, which has exclusive competence in the development of revenue. Councillors can not increase the budget deficit, limiting the practice of their activity to the changes of the provisions of the draft, but they are confined in the amounts specified by the President.

Disturbing are the following facts: In 2003

investments planned to spend 12 mln zł, while the 2010 has 35 million, but when you subtract the amount of 22 mln zł loan is the level of own resources for development of the city is only 13 mln zł.

municipal debt will rise to 71 mln zł, when in 2009 it amounted to 49 mln zł, in 2008, only 25 mln zł. In 2009 spłacaliśmy zł 10 million loan installment when in 2010, already 16 mln zł, later to be even worse.

In 2011, the amount of the investment will fall to the level of 2003, because it's time repayment of loans, with increasingly higher installments and City Treasurer at the last Commission quietly informed that the Strategy is planned to continue borrowing the city (?!). This borrowing will not be bad if they invest in projects with a view to generating income and improving the municipality, as the objects that were coming in our city, it would afford us more and zarabialibyśmy to repay loans (for $ 5 million investment in Arming zł Field South is an exception, exception councilors met with determination, on which the municipality earns by selling them to investors, it is estimated that the area of \u200b\u200bthe arming of South Fields will be worth over 100 million zł, not counting the resulting value resulting from new jobs created in the municipality KK.).

now for the money, including a loan to renovate one or the other object, which will generate maintenance costs. The upshot is that, as I read the records of the city budgets of the last few years, in most cases is such that for every zł issued an investment after its completion, the maintenance of an object created in the next financial year we spend an average of 2 cents. In other words, if, for example, in 2010 we will spend 35 million on investments zł, it in 2011 the cost of maintaining established or upgraded infrastructure will amount to 700,000 zł. Instead, get as much income, so the municipality must issue for the maintenance of what to build. This explains the borrowing municipality, because nobody wants to slow the pace of investment ... but this state, that is the municipality's credit rating, it will not last forever.

Not being the opposite of modernization Whom Culture Kozle for $ 7 million zł, a fortiori, the modernization of a residential building in Port Street for $ 800 thousand, is to announce that after putting them to use them, you will need to pay extra. In this context, is as tragic next year, and this is why, since such investments, the performance of which borrowed money has been issued, generating costs, and profits are not more, for example, rather than build a large complex of recreation - sports (Water Park with facilities, etc.) on which the municipality may earn money, the current Mayor of the City proposes to renovate a small swimming pool indoor swimming pool, and yes you will continue to fulfill its necessary function, but will pay extra for its existence.

to pay extra here and there, the municipality must make money in several places. Do not create new sources of revenue, municipality is still a debt ... and a day in which everything is suddenly going to end is coming, because there will be money. Therefore, you must change the way municipal spending money from jobs at the cost of generating profitable job, as a consequence increase the level of expenditure to enable the provision of the aid, municipal construction, and generally raising the comfort of living in KK.

I'm working on Economic Program for the municipality Kedzierzyn-Kozle, which if implemented, and the conditions which guarantee the functioning of the completed, this will create in Kedzierzyn - Kozle at least 500 new jobs, while increasing the income of the commune of good zł several million per year, and even more ... but write about it in around February 2010, when I presented the mentioned program.

Yours

Richard Masalski - City Council Cllr Kedzierzyn - Kozle

Building Horizontal Wood Slats

Education and upbringing.

Hi!

read the document describing the status of implementation of educational tasks Kedzierzyn - Koźle for school year 2008 / 9, which was the axis of the discussions at City Council session K - K, held on 12 November 2009. In addition, it bald figures. Surrounded be analyzed to reach conclusions and possibly to propose corrective measures or to improve. And so, in a nutshell.

in kindergarten even though the classes are taught in a fun, however, is a science (for kids is all effort.) My objection raises the fact that the Polish state in the educational subsidy for our city does not include preschool children, which led to better prepare future first class. 400 school children outside the education system because they have no seats in the nursery It then impinges negatively on the work of teachers in primary schools and secondary schools. After all, we already know that just one ill young man, to dissuade the majority of the group learning and good behavior. In addition, kindergarten pupils, as is clear from the survey is much better at life. - I suggested the construction of new kindergartens, which met with official silence and support the words of one director of a kindergarten.

dominates the view that the more funds allocated to education, including academic performance as manifested through higher assessments of final examinations. For us, this evidence does not work. It turns out that these schools, which account for the most money per student, have the weakest results. For example, school X average spent per pupil, 6764 zł, while the Y school per pupil spent 8205 zł, a final exam results at school subsidized per person in a smaller amount is in school X was 8 / 9, while in School Y, which is subsidized at a higher amount of final examinations was the result of 2 / 9, or less. Next. WK - K school divisions (classes) are almost equal and each count in primary schools from 18 to 21 students in secondary schools from 22 - 23 This suggests that the results of final examinations should be comparable. They are not.

Many young people do not understand the basis of knowledge transferred to them in the first three years of study, there were too many classes 1 - 3, then bored in the years just disturbing others. In order to improve exam results suggested that class 1 - 3 schools consisted of eight students. Three years of science and education in a small chamber group, will acquire the factual knowledge base of students. This will result in this that no one will be incurred in subsequent years a large, even a 40 - bed units, because it will be a disciplined person, brought up and educated. (Signaled organization does not reduce the number of people working in education, but will move some staff to primary education.)

Speaking on behalf of all school principals, one school director criticized the idea as an argument specifying what memory I quote, "a small group can not find anyone capable of, and the weaker students will not have to match someone. " (!?) Then, if the class is a few people, everyone benefits the most, because they can be safely and effectively explain, teach, educate. Perhaps

considerations would go away, if not for the fact that the information submitted to the City Council on the implementation of educational tasks do not present any problems. One gets the impression reading the content of material that teachers have no criticisms, virtually nothing has happened that the test results did not come out the best (only 7 out of 22 schools approached the maximum number of points, when eight barely reached 50% points and 5 do not not even approached the 50% points), there are no students the troublemakers, the relationship between all parties present in the school are great (teachers, pupils, parents), and targets facing the municipal education achieved. - That's why I reported the proposal, which was to require school principals to state the reasons for the resulting grade of final examination and identification of proposals for corrective action and improve. Only I was behind a proposal. Half of the council was against the other half abstained from voting. - After the session came to me one of the councilors saying: "I have a moral hangover. Hotels right to request tests requested by you. Not supporting your proposal - got cold feet. "

Add this site to be that many municipalities do not pays for elementary and secondary schools, by financing the subsidy by only teaching and exam results of their schools are at comparable levels as in the K - K K Municipality - K receives educational grant from the state budget of more than 24 million zł and pays from its own budget of more than 15 million zł. It can therefore be expected to produce better results. - To my question: "If this is so good, why is so wrong? "replied undercurrent of directors.

Richard Masalski - City Council Cllr Kedzierzyn - Kozle