Hi!
read the document describing the status of implementation of educational tasks Kedzierzyn - Koźle for school year 2008 / 9, which was the axis of the discussions at City Council session K - K, held on 12 November 2009. In addition, it bald figures. Surrounded be analyzed to reach conclusions and possibly to propose corrective measures or to improve. And so, in a nutshell.
in kindergarten even though the classes are taught in a fun, however, is a science (for kids is all effort.) My objection raises the fact that the Polish state in the educational subsidy for our city does not include preschool children, which led to better prepare future first class. 400 school children outside the education system because they have no seats in the nursery It then impinges negatively on the work of teachers in primary schools and secondary schools. After all, we already know that just one ill young man, to dissuade the majority of the group learning and good behavior. In addition, kindergarten pupils, as is clear from the survey is much better at life. - I suggested the construction of new kindergartens, which met with official silence and support the words of one director of a kindergarten.
dominates the view that the more funds allocated to education, including academic performance as manifested through higher assessments of final examinations. For us, this evidence does not work. It turns out that these schools, which account for the most money per student, have the weakest results. For example, school X average spent per pupil, 6764 zł, while the Y school per pupil spent 8205 zł, a final exam results at school subsidized per person in a smaller amount is in school X was 8 / 9, while in School Y, which is subsidized at a higher amount of final examinations was the result of 2 / 9, or less. Next. WK - K school divisions (classes) are almost equal and each count in primary schools from 18 to 21 students in secondary schools from 22 - 23 This suggests that the results of final examinations should be comparable. They are not.
Many young people do not understand the basis of knowledge transferred to them in the first three years of study, there were too many classes 1 - 3, then bored in the years just disturbing others. In order to improve exam results suggested that class 1 - 3 schools consisted of eight students. Three years of science and education in a small chamber group, will acquire the factual knowledge base of students. This will result in this that no one will be incurred in subsequent years a large, even a 40 - bed units, because it will be a disciplined person, brought up and educated. (Signaled organization does not reduce the number of people working in education, but will move some staff to primary education.)
Speaking on behalf of all school principals, one school director criticized the idea as an argument specifying what memory I quote, "a small group can not find anyone capable of, and the weaker students will not have to match someone. " (!?) Then, if the class is a few people, everyone benefits the most, because they can be safely and effectively explain, teach, educate. Perhaps
considerations would go away, if not for the fact that the information submitted to the City Council on the implementation of educational tasks do not present any problems. One gets the impression reading the content of material that teachers have no criticisms, virtually nothing has happened that the test results did not come out the best (only 7 out of 22 schools approached the maximum number of points, when eight barely reached 50% points and 5 do not not even approached the 50% points), there are no students the troublemakers, the relationship between all parties present in the school are great (teachers, pupils, parents), and targets facing the municipal education achieved. - That's why I reported the proposal, which was to require school principals to state the reasons for the resulting grade of final examination and identification of proposals for corrective action and improve. Only I was behind a proposal. Half of the council was against the other half abstained from voting. - After the session came to me one of the councilors saying: "I have a moral hangover. Hotels right to request tests requested by you. Not supporting your proposal - got cold feet. "
Add this site to be that many municipalities do not pays for elementary and secondary schools, by financing the subsidy by only teaching and exam results of their schools are at comparable levels as in the K - K K Municipality - K receives educational grant from the state budget of more than 24 million zł and pays from its own budget of more than 15 million zł. It can therefore be expected to produce better results. - To my question: "If this is so good, why is so wrong? "replied undercurrent of directors.
Richard Masalski - City Council Cllr Kedzierzyn - Kozle
0 comments:
Post a Comment