Hi! Some workers
MOPS in KK I'm pretty, because you inquire, and a storm of standard measures. If the Local Government Appellate Board in Opole share contained in one of the complaints (ward) to the view in it, which is my own, it ... it will be beneficial for many sick wards of the Centre.
What are we talking about?
Social Assistance Act recognizes the care allowance and lodging allowances for income, which reduces the amount of permanent benefit. However, Housing Allowances Act provides that the care allowance and rent allowance is not income. And to what conclusion I reached? If two laws in a manner contrary to regulate the same subject, I think the rules should apply for a national favorable ... and should not be on the following items reduce the amount of permanent benefit.
This concerned patients and pensioners.
Healthy, entitled to receive social assistance benefits, you must help them to outsource the implementation of intervention works, for consideration under the social contract concluded. For breaches of its provisions, shall in accordance with the provisions of the Social Welfare withhold benefits ... Loading
so a dispute over how aid policy: the current distribution in accordance with the law versus a legitimate addiction help from ... For example, cleaning the city ...
Once this is because of this 29 employees MOPS writes open letter accusing me of spoiling the good name of his staff, what do people accountable to the Mayor for ...?
For what?
's already on 19 August 2008, I informed the Mayor that the dwellings, the company then owned by the municipal ADM Blachownia Ltd. were included in the residential community resource KK. Mayor stubbornly rejected this view, although at my request, the City Council has acquired an independent expert, who commanded the impairment the official position. In the end went to court. This in its support of the ruling (of 1 April 2010) clearly states the correctness of my view.
What does this mean?
And the fact that the company first mentioned the work (it was liquidated in late 2009), not having one of the factors reducing the amount of rent, as specified in the relevant Ordinance of the Mayor of the City collects has illegally inflated rent. From my calculations show that each tenant, which was owned by ADM Blachownia in the period from January 2006 r to March 2008 as the successor to the municipality that the company should return after about 1000 zł.
The reason of these phrases Mayor did not want to pay, it was his faulty view of the law. Now everything is clear. No doubt. I see no obstacle to what has been collected in the municipal company illegally city with good will have cast.
I was amazed when the Mayor and now resists.
Regards.
Masalski Richard - City Council Cllr Kedzierzyn - Kozle
0 comments:
Post a Comment